雜志介紹

Georisk-assessment And Management Of Risk For Engineered Systems And Geohazards雜志介紹

《Georisk-assessment And Management Of Risk For Engineered Systems And Geohazards》是一(yi)本(ben)以English為主的(de)(de)(de)未(wei)開放(fang)獲(huo)取國(guo)際(ji)優秀期刊，中文(wen)名(ming)稱工程系統和地質災害的(de)(de)(de)地質風(feng)險評(ping)估和風(feng)險管(guan)理，本(ben)刊主要出版、報道工程技術-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY領域(yu)的(de)(de)(de)研(yan)究動態以及(ji)在該(gai)(gai)(gai)領域(yu)取得的(de)(de)(de)各方(fang)面的(de)(de)(de)經驗和科(ke)研(yan)成(cheng)果，介(jie)紹(shao)該(gai)(gai)(gai)領域(yu)有關(guan)本(ben)專業(ye)(ye)的(de)(de)(de)最新(xin)(xin)進展，探討行業(ye)(ye)發(fa)展的(de)(de)(de)思路和方(fang)法，以促進學術信(xin)息(xi)交流，提高行業(ye)(ye)發(fa)展。該(gai)(gai)(gai)刊已被(bei)國(guo)際(ji)權威數據庫SCIE收錄，為該(gai)(gai)(gai)領域(yu)相關(guan)學科(ke)的(de)(de)(de)發(fa)展起到(dao)了良好的(de)(de)(de)推動作(zuo)用，也得到(dao)了本(ben)專業(ye)(ye)人員的(de)(de)(de)廣泛認(ren)可。該(gai)(gai)(gai)刊最新(xin)(xin)影響因子為6.5，最新(xin)(xin)CiteScore 指數為8.7。

本刊(kan)近期(qi)中(zhong)國學者發(fa)表的論(lun)文主要有：

• Future of machine learning in geotechnics

  Author: Phoon, Kok-Kwang; Zhang, Wengang

• Report for ISSMGE TC309/TC304/TC222 Third ML dialogue on Data-Driven Site Characterization (DDSC) 3 December 2021, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway (Online)

  Author: Phoon, Kok-Kwang; Cao, Zi-Jun; Liu, Zhongqiang; Ching, Jianye

• On prediction of slope failure time with the inverse velocity method

  Author: Zhang, Jie; Yao, Hong-zeng; Wang, Zi-peng; Xue, Ya-dong; Zhang, Lu-lu

• Multi-fidelity data-driven modelling of rate-dependent behaviour of soft clays

  Author: He, Geng-Fu; Zhang, Pin; Yin, Zhen-Yu; Jin, Yin-Fu; Yang, Yi

英文介紹

Georisk-assessment And Management Of Risk For Engineered Systems And Geohazards雜志英文介紹

Georisk-assessment And Management Of Risk For Engineered Systems And Geohazards is that uncertainties associated with geomaterials (soils, rocks), geologic processes, and possible subsequent treatments, are usually large and complex and these uncertainties play an indispensable role in the risk assessment and management of engineered and natural systems. Significant the  oretical and practical challenges remain on quantifying these uncertainties and developing defensible risk management methodologies that are acceptable to decision makers and stakeholders.